A focused view of the Commercial · MT North team's performance across Cycle 25-26 — individual results,
competency profiles, and how the team positions relative to the broader PI AgSciences Brazil benchmark.
4
Team members
3.01
Department mean
3.42
Top rating
1
Sub-regions
01 · Department Overview
Commercial at a glance.
How the team is delivering across Cycle 25-26 — the shape of performance, the strongest competencies,
and how the department positions in the broader company context.
Department mean
3.01/ 5.00
σ = 0.31 · n = 4
Exceeds (≥4.0)
0
Top-quartile contributors
Meets (3.0–4.0)
2
Solid delivery backbone
Positioning
86.7%
of company mean · below company pace
Where Commercial sits vs. the company
Visual comparison of average Overall rating. Each dot is anonymized — no individual comparison, just the team's general position.
1.02.03.04.05.0
Company 3.47
Commercial 3.01
BuildingApproachingMeetingExceeding
Overall Rating distribution
Where Commercial team members land on the rating scale.
0
0.0
0
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.5
0
2.0
2
2.5
2
3.0
0
3.5
0
4.0
0
4.5
Competency strengths
Commercial profile ranked from strongest to weakest competency.
01
Planning & Organization
Dept
3.25
Company
3.56
91% of company
02
Problem Solving
Dept
3.25
Company
3.64
89% of company
03
Adaptability
Dept
3.25
Company
3.59
90% of company
04
Communications
Dept
3.00
Company
3.28
92% of company
05
Customer Service
Dept
3.00
Company
3.64
82% of company
06
Teamwork
Dept
2.75
Company
3.72
74% of company
02 · Team
Every review, one card.
Click any card for the full profile — competencies, goals, job duties, narrative comments, and general information including current compensation.
AA
Anderson Cristiano de Assis
RTV
Commercial · MT North
TOP IN DEPT
3.42
3.00 G4.00 JD3.33 C
98% of company mean
NM
Nilson Masquieto
GTV MT NORTE
Commercial · MT North
3.04
2.50 G3.00 JD3.33 C
88% of company mean
AD
Alderi Marcos Dalmaso
RTV
Commercial · MT North
2.92
2.67 G3.00 JD3.00 C
84% of company mean
AR
Allan Fontes Rigonatto
RTV
Commercial · MT North
2.67
2.33 G3.00 JD2.67 C
77% of company mean
03 · Positioning
How each team member sits in context.
For each person: where they land on the 1–5 rating scale, with reference lines for
Commercial mean (solid colored line) and Company mean (dashed grey).
The % value shows proximity to the company average — not a ranking. The goal is context, not competition.
Commercial mean (3.01)
Company mean (3.47)
Individual rating
AA
Anderson Cristiano de Assis
RTV
3.42
98%
of company avg
NM
Nilson Masquieto
GTV MT NORTE
3.04
88%
of company avg
AD
Alderi Marcos Dalmaso
RTV
2.92
84%
of company avg
AR
Allan Fontes Rigonatto
RTV
2.67
77%
of company avg
💡 How to read this
A proximity of 100% means the person is right at the company average. Above 100% indicates delivery above the company-wide benchmark, below 100% indicates ratings below it. This is not a judgment — it is calibration context. The distribution of the Commercial team naturally produces a mix above and below the company mean.
04 · Salary Adjustments
Salary adjustments for Cycle 26-27.
3 of the 4 team members in MT North received an approved salary increase for the next cycle. Only those with adjustments are shown here.
Receiving an increase
3
Total current
R$ 576.000
Total proposed
R$ 660.000
Total increase
+R$ 84.000
AA
Anderson Cristiano de Assis
RTV
Current: R$ 180.000
Proposed: R$ 228.000
+26.7%
+R$ 48.000
AD
Alderi Marcos Dalmaso
RTV
Current: R$ 216.000
Proposed: R$ 240.000
+11.1%
+R$ 24.000
AR
Allan Fontes Rigonatto
RTV
Current: R$ 180.000
Proposed: R$ 192.000
+6.7%
+R$ 12.000
05 · Action Plan
Start · Stop · Continue framework
Define and track action items for each team member. Use the Start/Stop/Continue framework to capture what behaviors should begin, end, or be reinforced. Items persist on this device — to share progress, use Export CSV.